Uma ‘Terceira Via’ para o Estudo das Idéias Políticas: A Vorstellungsgeschichte como resposta aos problemas colocados pela Cambridge School of the History of Political Thought.

Auteurs-es

  • Lukas Gabriel Grzybowski Universität Hamburg / Núcleo de Estudos Mediterrânicos

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.24858/44

Mots-clés :

História das idéias políticas, Vorstellungsgeschichte, Cambridge School of the History of Political Thought.

Résumé

A história das idéias políticas é um ramo de investigações estabelecido desde, pelo menos, o século XIX. Em meados do século XX, contudo, ela passou a sofrer fortes ataques vindos dos novos desenvolvimentos da filosofia e da lingüística. Alguns historiadores buscaram incorporar aspectos desses avanços na pesquisa do pensamento político, criando assim a Cambridge School of the History of Political Thought. Hoje, anos após o auge daqueles debates, é possível notar que as propostas teóricas e metodológicas da Cambridge School criaram um verdadeiro entrave à pesquisa da história das idéias. Surgida na Alemanha ao mesmo tempo em que a escola inglesa, a Vorstellungsgeschichte se apresenta como uma ‘terceira via’ para o estudo do pensamento de épocas passadas. Baseando-se em uma revolução do paradigma historiográfico, ela propõe um novo olhar sobre o passado que vem complementar o conhecimento sobre as idéias dos homens de outras épocas e apresenta-se como solução a diversos problemas colocados pelos historiadores de Cambridge.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Lukas Gabriel Grzybowski, Universität Hamburg / Núcleo de Estudos Mediterrânicos

Anteriores: Grad. e Mes. - Universidade Federal do Paraná.

Atuais: Historisches Seminar - Universität Hamburg

Nucleo de Estudos Mediterranicos - NEMED/UFPR

Area de atuacao: Pesqusia

Temas: Historia das ideias / Historia politica / Vorstellungsgeschichte / Historiografia medieval - sec. XI-XIV Europa ocidental e Pen. Iberica.

Références

BEUMANN, Helmut. "Die Historiographie des Mittelalters als Quelle für die Ideengeschichte des Königtums" In:. BEUMANN, H. (ed.). Ideengeschichtliche Studien zu Einhard und anderen Geschichtsschreibern des frühen Mittelalters. 2. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1969.

BLACK, Antony. Political thought in Europe: 1250 - 1450. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992.

BURNS, J. H. "Introduction" In:. BURNS, J. H. (ed.). The Cambridge history of medieval political thought: C. 150-c. 1450. 1. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.

CARLYLE, Alexander J.; CARLYLE, Robert Warrand. A history of mediaeval political theory in the West: Vol IV. Theories of the relation of the empire and the papacy from the tenth century to the twelfth. 2 ed. Edinburgh, Blackwood, 1950.

CARLYLE, Alexander J.; CARLYLE, Robert Warrand. A history of mediaeval political theory in the West: Vol. V. Political theory of the thirteenth century. 4 ed. Edinburgh, Blackwood, 1950.

CARLYLE, Alexander J.; CARLYLE, Robert Warrand. A history of mediaeval political theory in the West: Vol VI. Political theory from 1300 to 1600. 3 ed. Edinburgh, Blackwood, 1950.

CARLYLE, Alexander J.; CARLYLE, Robert Warrand. A history of mediaeval political theory in the West: Vol. III. Political theory from the tenth century to the thirteenth. 3 ed. Edinburgh, Blackwood, 1950.

CARLYLE, Alexander J.; CARLYLE, Robert Warrand. A history of mediaeval political theory in the West: Vol. I. The roman lawyers of the second century to the political writers of the ninth. 3 ed. Edinburgh, Blackwood, 1950.

CARLYLE, Alexander J.; CARLYLE, Robert Warrand. A history of mediaeval political theory in the West: Vol. II. The political theory of the roman lawyers and canonists from the tenth century to the thirteenth century. 3 ed. Edinburgh, Blackwood, 1950.

GIERKE, Otto von. Political Theories of the Middle Age. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1900.

GIERKE, Otto von. Das deutsche Genossenschaftsrecht: Dritter Band: Die Staats- und Korporationslehre des Altertums und des Mittelalters und ihre Aufnahme in Deutschland. Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgemeinschaft, 1954.

GOETZ, Hans-Werner. Proseminar Geschichte: Mittelalter. 3 ed. Stuttgart, Ulmer, 2006.

GOETZ, Hans-Werner. "„Vorstellungsgeschichte": Menschliche Vorstellungen und Meinungen als Dimension der Vergangenheit: Bemerkungen zu einem jüngeren Arbeitsfeld der Geschichtswissenschaft als Beitrag zu einer Methodik der Quellenauswertung" In:. GOETZ, H.-W., et al. (eds.). Vorstellungsgeschichte: Gesammelte Schriften zu Wahrnehmungen, Deutungen und Vorstellungen im Mittelalter. Bochum, Winkler, 2007.

LEWIS, Clive Staple. The discarded image: An introduction to medieval and Renaissance literature. 1 ed. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2007.

NEDERMAN, Cary J. Lineages of European political thought: Explorations along the medievalmodern divide from John of Salisbury to Hegel. Washington, DC, Catholic University of America Press, 2009.

OAKLEY, Francis. Omnipotence, covenant, & order: An excursion in the history of ideas from Abelard to Leibniz. 1 ed. Ithaca, Cornell University Press, 1984.

OAKLEY, Francis. Politics and eternity: Studies in the history of medieval and early-modern political thought. Leiden; Boston, Brill, 1999.

OAKLEY, Francis. Empty bottles of gentilism: Kingship and the divine in late antiquity and the early Middle Ages (to 1050). New Haven, Yale University Press, 2010.

POCOCK, John Greville Agard. Politics, language, and time: Essays on political thought and history. 1 ed. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1989.

SKINNER, Quentin. "Bedeutung und Verstehen in der Ideengeschichte" In:. MULSOW, M.; MAHLER, A. (eds.). Die Cambridge School der politischen Ideengeschichte. Berlin, Suhrkamp, 2010.

ULLMANN, Walter. A history of political thought: The Middle Ages. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, Penguin Books, 1970.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2012-12-02

Comment citer

Grzybowski, L. G. (2012). Uma ‘Terceira Via’ para o Estudo das Idéias Políticas: A Vorstellungsgeschichte como resposta aos problemas colocados pela Cambridge School of the History of Political Thought. Revista Diálogos Mediterrânicos, (3), 143–159. https://doi.org/10.24858/44